CANDIDATES’ QUESTIONNAIRE
2005 CLARENCE VALLEY COUNCIL ELECTION
The CEC along with Valleywatch, Clarence Valley Conservation Coalition, Clarence Greens and the National Parks Association sent a questionnaire to all 36 Clarence Valley Council candidates asking for their views on a few environmental and social justice issues. This page is a condensed version of responses from the 11 candidates who cared enough to answer. The others must have been too busy 'campaigning'. The full responses are in a folder at the front counter of the Environment Centre, if you're interested.
What issues and concerns prompted you to stand for Council? 1.What issues and concerns prompted you to stand for Council? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: Previously on Pristine Waters Council & an advocate for a one valley council. I was concerned about the
area and council happenings. I was willing to listen and acquaint myself with issues and tried to make a fair and
balanced judgement. 2.What is your vision for the Clarence Valley 20 years from now? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: Ideally the valley would be in a better shape than it is now and if not, certainly no worse. I hope any
decisions made by the new council will not be regretted 20 years from now, that they meet the present and future needs
of the residents without detriment to the environment. My wish for the future would be cleaner rivers, healthy
environment and a great place to live and work. 3. What are the advantages of the one-valley Council? Are there any disadvantages? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: Less duplication of resources. Better utilisation of resources. Eventual cost savings in staff & infrastructure.
Savings in councillor expenses. Better able to compete with neighbouring councils for the available dollar. Whole-region
approach instead of piecemeal. Short-term disadvantage of set-up costs. 4. What does 'sustainability' mean to you? How would you promote it? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: Should be the key word for councillors. All decisions should be looked at according to their sustainability.
Any economic decisions must take into account environmental costs & the depletion of natural resources. I would not
make decisions merely for short term gain – always asking ‘is it sustainable?’ Learning from past mistakes made by
councils. 5. How will you encourage Council and public reconciliation between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: By encouraging & supporting Aboriginal people to stand for local govt. By speaking to Aboriginal people
and finding out their thoughts on issues. By supporting special reconciliation events and encouraging people to do the
same. 6. a) How would you protect the Clarence Valley from poorly-planned development? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: By carefully assessing any proposed developments. Asking questions as to a development’s sustainability,
suitability and impact on present and future needs. Abiding by guidelines already imposed by state & federal govts. 6. b) How would you protect the Clarence Valley from polluting industries? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: There are processes in place (EPA) to protect against polluting industries. By being scrupulous in
assessing applications and making sure they meet all criteria imposed by govt agencies. 6. c) How would you protect the Clarence Valley from badly-managed construction works? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: There are processes in place. Council officers are responsible to ensure all construction meets set criteria.
Councillors must choose a General Manager who is capable of ensuring all department heads are competent. 6. d) How would you protect the Clarence Valley from effluent discharge? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: Same answer applies for all parts of question 6. I would listen to what ratepayers are telling me and pass
on information to General Manager. I would try to stay aware and bring any detrimental activities to Council’s attention. 6. e) How would you protect the Clarence Valley from degradation of riparian vegetation? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: As for question 6 d). 7. With over 60 threatened species of native plants and animals in the Valley, what role should Council have in their
protection, on both public and private land? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: There are processes in place. Council must ensure developments minimise environmental impact.
Threatened species impact statements must be insisted upon. Don’t agree to 3 service & road corridors when one will
suffice! Council should educate on wildlife conservation – eg displays, childrens’ projects, proactive Environmental
Officers. 8.What do you see as the main water supply issues currently facing the Clarence Valley? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: Do not agree with the decision to fast-track the pipeline to Coffs Harbour. If the dam is to go ahead we
must minimise impacts. I would like to see alternatives discussed - eg desalination. We need education for water
conservation. We should reuse grey-water & adopt water-saving strategies – user pays, rain tanks, native gardens &
low flow showers. 9. Council produces an annual “State of the Environment Report”. Have you ever read one? How should these reports
feed back into council's decision-making processes? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: I did read them on Pristine Waters Council. Any council decisions must be made in conjunction with this
report. It should be an integral part of council’s decision-making process. 10. Enough words! Which past actions of yours would attract Green voters? Top of Page
Cathy Peck: I am environmentally aware and want to conserve what we have. My earliest actions in the Clarence valley
were as a vocal opponent of a turf farm that Ulmarra Council was going to approve on the Orara River. I was spokesman
at a council meeting. Our campaign was successful. While on Pristine Waters Council I was on Stormwater
Ambassadors school program and was an advocate for educating children to become environmentally aware. I was
council rep for National Tree Day.
What is your vision for the Clarence Valley 20 years from now?
What are the advantages of the one-valley Council? Are there any disadvantages?
What does 'sustainability' mean to you? How would you promote it?
How will you encourage Council and public reconciliation between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people?
How would you protect the Clarence Valley from poorly-planned development?
How would you protect the Clarence Valley from polluting industries?
How would you protect the Clarence Valley from badly-managed construction works?
How would you protect the Clarence Valley from effluent discharge?
How would you protect the Clarence Valley from degradation of riparian vegetation?
With over 60 threatened species of native plants and animals in the Valley, what role should Council have in their
protection, on both public and private land?
What do you see as the main water supply issues currently facing the Clarence Valley?
Council produces an annual “State of the Environment Report”. Have you ever read one? How should these reports
feed back into council's decision-making processes?
Enough words! Which past actions of yours would attract Green voters?
Chris Gulaptis: Primary issue was representation. Experience in local govt & strong public advocate. Cutting through
amalgamation requires experienced people who represent the community but are capable of listening to reason and
making decisions based on merit.
Mark Kingsley: We need to improve employment opportunities and quality of life for young people. I am concerned
about the level of educational achievement by Aboriginal people and at times the level of racism. Although I advocate
economic development to provide more job opportunities for youth I am concerned by inadequately planned
development.
Simon Williams: A lack of youth issue representation. Primary industries’ effects on the river system, the effects of
trawling in Lake Wooloweyah & surrounding river system. Preparation for mental health needs as population expands.
Lack of aged care services/accommodation in the region. A lack of environmentally safe practices and sustainability in
the region.
Paul Covington: I enjoyed my term on Grafton City Council and was a supporter of one council for the Clarence Valley.
I want to do as much as I can to make the Valley the best place in the world for my children to grow up in.
Vivienne Hughes: The Valley is in a good position to plan for a brighter future for all constituents. Councillors should
take a cooperative and intelligent approach to preserving what is good in the Valley and developing a sustainable
economy.
Doug McKenzie: Over-development & poorly planned development on the coast. A proliferation of tar & cement in
preference to sustainable landcare practices. Threat to wetlands & coastal crown land.
Joy Matthews: The knowledge I’ve gained in the last 14 years is recyclable! I have shared my points of views with
communities, schools on issues like waste management. I have been on 16 committees in the Clarence, including
estuary, river and coastal management committees – all concerned with developing strategic management plans.
Ian Tiley: The new Council requires people with sound understanding of local govt. I am skilled in local govt law &
planning and in local government finance and accounting processes. I have mediation and facilitation skills. My current
doctoral thesis is on “Local Government Amalgamations in New South Wales since 1999: What Impacts for Local
Democracy”?
Helen Tyas Tunggal: Too many council decisions are made without regard for consequences. Many developments do
NOT comply with the local DCP. I have been designing & delivering educational programs for sustainability, empowering
& assisting school communities in designing their preferred future for educational, social, cultural and environmental
improvement. The time has come to commit more of my time, skills and practical experience for the betterment of the
Valley & its current and future residents.
Merilyn Baxter: Initially there weren’t issues or great concerns that prompted me to run. It has been a dream for some
years and I have a deep desire to serve the Clarence Valley. I want to be a member of a team finding solutions to
community issues. Since making the commitment to run for council and doing some research I am now concerned about
a number of issues. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: A valley which offers opportunities for young people but still maintains the character and essence that
we enjoy today.
Mark Kingsley: In 20 years time I would like the Clarence Valley to be a place known for its natural beauty. I would like
it to be at the forefront of the use of alternative energy sources, particularly solar power. I would hope that petroleum-
powered cars are extinct and that much of the transport is by energy-efficient public transport. I would like it to be a place
where everyone is respected regardless of income level, level of ability, gender, religion or race.
Simon Williams: That industry practices & poor development aren’t the reason ‘the area never took off’. That greed &
self-interest aren’t the motivation for decisions made in the area. Sustainable Industry practices, a move towards greater
community awareness of the importance of a healthy ecosystem, more consultation with environmental specialists. That
there is a greater sense of community pride in the aged and youth. That environmental consideration was the basis of all
decision-making processes in the region.
Paul Covington: To achieve the above we need to have good employment prospects for our children and a strong,
vibrant community. We need sensible, sustainable development and good planning processes. It is vital that we maintain
current infrastructure and develop new amenities and facilities that will benefit us for a long time to come.
Vivienne Hughes: I see that in twenty years the Valley could be a model community with the same relaxed atmosphere
that we have now but with a vibrant economy; a place where the children of the Valley can complete their education and
take on the careers of their choice without leaving home. It would have an accessible but better managed natural
environment. All localities within the Valley will be (in their own unique way) contributing to and benefiting from the
Valley’s economic, social, cultural and environmental prosperity.
Doug McKenzie: We must ensure the beauty, character and ambience of our valley and environment – from beaches to
mountains, from rivers to farmland to towns, villages & city, are kept and preserved.
Joy Matthews: I hope we have controlled population growth, particularly controlled near the coast, rivers & riparian
zones. There is to be a valley-wide local environmental plan. We will all have input to where urban, rural & commercial
zones will be. There is already evidence of over-population in Yamba. We must be ever-vigilant on the Clarence River &
tributaries.
Ian Tiley: To enhance our Clarence region as a united, great place to live, a locality rich in values, prosperous,
safeguarding the natural and built environment, its people caring, secure and tolerant. Our Clarence will be one of the
best addresses in Australia.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: A place where we will balance economic growth with the current and future needs of our society
and environment - a paradise with plenty of fresh water supporting biodiversity and human needs - with all-ability access,
energy and water efficiency, viable agriculture and industries, jobs of the future, non polluting public transport, targeting
zero waste. A place where social, cultural and environmental outcomes are considered as highly as economic ones.
Merilyn Baxter: A very balanced clean energy efficient environment. To be forward thinking in planting planning and
building so that future generations will benefit should be an integral part of every local council. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Advantages: One single body dealing with whole of catchment development and issues.
Disadvantages: Lack of representation and reduction in financial assistance grants.
Mark Kingsley: Advantage: more efficient service delivery because of the larger economy and less duplication. Tourism
could be promoted on a larger scale to the benefit of all towns. Disadvantage: parochialism. This could be extremely
divisive if Councillors refuse to take a whole valley approach.
Simon Williams: Difficulties in fair representation of all community groups & all council regions. Advantages are
unification of ‘one valley’ vibe & more responsibility on council to truly represent all regions and not be biased to certain
areas.
Paul Covington: This is a dead in the water issue now. Let’s move on.
Vivienne Hughes: The Clarence River system and the community that lives here is inter-dependent. We cannot
separate our needs or the needs of our environment. Advantage: cooperation with one another to the benefit of all.
Disadvantage: parochialism. Smaller communities will suffer if this happens, as they are least likely to have local people
on council.
Doug McKenzie: No economic advantages, just escalating costs. Perhaps minor coordinated environmental advantages
but probably not.
Joy Matthews: The advantages are slow to come to mind. Already the budget doesn’t seem to allow for continued
vegetation management and stormwater program. I hope all the studies & consultation done so far are not left on the
shelf – eg strategic valley plans on valley growth, industry, releasing of inappropriate land lots etc.
Ian Tiley: Advantages: 1 Some economies of scale. 2 Stronger planning instruments to safeguard our natural
environment, investors and lifestyles. 3 Whole-of valley instruments. 4 Region can be more competitive economically.
Disadvantages: remoteness of representative democracy which will need innovative participatory mechanisms.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: Participation of a cross section of people working together in the best interests of the valley, rather
than supporting polarisation, rivalries, parochialism and single issues. Opportunities for whole valley strategic planning.
The valley will become a stronger entity with more bargaining power. Disadvantages: if there is significant imbalance in
the council’s representation of residents either geographically, politically or in the socio cultural mix.
Merilyn Baxter: A one Valley Council I believe is empowerment. We can be a united body of approx 49,000 people and
fight for those things that are worth fighting for. The only downside I see at present is that if people don’t vote intelligently
on polling day and vote for people only in their own district, there could be unfair representation and if candidates have
bias for their own community and don’t see the Clarence Valley as one community. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Sustainability means we leave it as we found it, or better. Developments should be screened for
compatibility with the environment. They should be determined on merit and on a sustainable basis. Best practice
methods should be encouraged.
Mark Kingsley: Sustainability is about long-term planning which considers population change, infrastructure needs,
natural resource use and environmental protection. Planning should incorporate alternative energy sources, energy
efficient designs & water-saving devices. The aim should be to present the following generation with a quality of life
superior to ours.
Simon Williams: Sustainability means practices that ensure the said practices can be continued into the future. That the
environment can sustain or complement the practice & that the practice has little (preferably no impact) on any part of
the environment or that the impact can be correctly managed. I would push environmental importance and awareness.
Paul Covington: Sustainability means “living within our means”. While it is necessary to continue with the Shannon
Creek project the community needs to find ways of using what natural resources we have smarter. This can be achieved
by developing practical and sensible planning and building policies and educating people on how to be energy efficient
etc.
Vivienne Hughes: Sustainability means future generations can flourish without impinging on the environment or wasting
its resources. We should treat trees as the renewable and valuable resource that they are. Resource reuse is important.
Industry and commerce should incorporate aspects of our environment, culture and heritage
Doug McKenzie: Creation without destruction. A balanced harmony using resources in renewable ways that do not
cause pollution. Good planning for future generations.
Joy Matthews: Can something survive man’s interference? Eg overuse of beachfronts, Lake Wooleweyah fishing,
water supply. We must ask the sustainability question when there are motorways going through wetland with protected
bird species. Are there enough jobs to sustain the population? No. Is our fishing industry sustainable? No.
Ian Tiley: It means conserving & enhancing our resources so ecological processes are maintained and the quality of life,
now and in the future, can be increased. I believe in the precautionary principle, intergenerational equity, & reducing the
‘human footprint’. Sustainability should be a consideration in reports to council, and through all council’s planning
instruments and strategic plans & goals.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: The ability to sustain and nourish life and quality of life. Making choices that keep food & water
unpolluted; that use renewable resources, reduce waste, conserve energy and water; develop non polluting agriculture
and industries, protect our environment and consider the social, cultural, environmental and economic consequences of
current actions. I would support progressive development that isn’t detrimental to the rich fabric we have with our friendly
communities and beautiful environment.
Merilyn Baxter: Sustainability to me means self supporting, maintaining, conserving and ongoing help. I’m not sure how
I would promote it. I would have to do a lot more research but subsidies do come to mind. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: I am running with Trevor Kapeen, an Aboriginal person. I believe Trevor has the capacity to provide a
meaningful exchange with the aboriginal community.
Mark Kingsley: Developing personal relationships is the best way. We need public activities that promote reconciliation.
PM Howard should apologise. Aboriginal sacred sites should be returned to their rightful owners. We need activities that
celebrate Aboriginal culture. Aboriginal people should be empowered to make their own decisions and take responsibility
for their lives. There is alot we can learn from the Aboriginal elders.
Simon Williams: Encourage more youth representatives and Aboriginal representatives to run for council, as I believe
the issue of reconciliation is related to the generation that is usually running for council. Much more consultation between
groups & promotion of community pride in Aboriginal achievements; Arts, sports & community-based.
Paul Covington: I have always supported policies that help both indigenous people and those who are disadvantaged.
Vivienne Hughes: I Aboriginal culture has a lot to offer western society - eg sense of community. But we have to stop
seeing Aboriginal people as a separate section of our community. The colour of somebody’s skin should not determine
whether they are valuable citizens or friends.
Doug McKenzie: Respect and understanding.
Joy Matthews: Maintain council liaison groups throughout the valley from Baryulgil to Birrigan Gargle. Maintain former
Maclean Council’s policy. When organising meetings be conscious of cultural differences in time & place & formalities. I
have a wonderful Aboriginal woman - Glenda McPhail - on my team. I mentored an Aboriginal person on council.
Ian Tiley: I would (again) engage in direct dialogue with Aboriginal consultative committees and would expand more
inclusive processes for participation. I would recognise Aboriginal heritage & values in civic functions. I initiated the
Aboriginal flag daily raising at Maclean council and as mayor proposed a statement of reconciliation which council
adopted.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: We should encourage mutual respect and acknowledge Aboriginal people as traditional owners
and custodians. We should encourage affirmative action to address lack of indigenous representation in decision-
making. In 1986 and 87 I was employed by the education department as an Aboriginal Education consultant servicing
300 schools in the old Met North Region. It is imperative we include an Aboriginal perspective in all locally designed
resources
Merilyn Baxter: I believe children at a very early age need to be taught that every one regardless of race, colour and
creed should be treated equally. I believe everyone should be treated equally. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Strategic planning for much of the Clarence is in place. There are protection measures under these
guidelines.
Mark Kingsley: Development applications must meet all criteria and must be in line with long-term valley planning
requirements. If this means that it takes longer for plans to be approved that is too bad. What is important is that the
Clarence Valley remains a place that we are proud for our children to live in.
Simon Williams: More thorough consultation. Agreed Environmental Protection Practices standardized throughout
Clarence region. More community participation in planning. More communication between community & council.
Paul Covington: Poorly planned development won’t happen if the correct policies are in place and Council sticks to
them.
Vivienne Hughes: If there’s a good strategic plan, then council’s response to development applications won’t be
reactionary. All developments should fit into our concept of the type of environment and community that we want to live
in.
Doug McKenzie: Introduce LEPs/DCPs appropriate for areas. Ensure valley-wide coordination. Put infrastructure in
place before development. Appoint environmental manager high up in the council hierarchy, not just an ignored position
with no power.
Joy Matthews: I would have DAs reviewed, speak to staff of my concerns and convey these to the community, speak
up at council meetings, ring govt planning offices (local & Sydney) speak to Minister for Planning or his advisor.
Ian Tiley: All development applications must comply totally with planning instruments. My track record over the last 9
years has been to always argue for this. Planning instruments need constant review and updating. New instruments are
urgently needed eg DCP for coastal villages such as Brooms Head. I would get involved in the shire wide LEP process.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: Long term strategic planning. Establish adequate DCPs & adhere to them. I will oppose poorly
planned development. More transparency in approval process - eg advertising of DAs. Residents should not have to
apply reactive strategies after important decisions have been made, rather than having the opportunity for pro-active
input.
Merilyn Baxter: By doing the appropriate research and listening to what the residents in the community have to say.
Forward planning and the future has to be considered. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Largely the EPA’s responsibility though council can issue infringement notices and prosecute.
Mark Kingsley: Industries need to be tightly regulated. It’s a shame our government refuses to sign the Kyoto Protocol.
If industries refuse to comply with the regulations then they should lose their licence to operate.
Simon Williams: Polluting Industries should be a description left in the 20th Century. Industries should be accountable
for all actions and regulations emplaced that ensure environmentally safe practices are adopted & implemented.
Paul Covington: Pollution is the responsibility of the EPA but Council can be proactive in educating industry leaders and
be quick in reporting any obvious breaches of EPA guidelines.
Vivienne Hughes: Council can insist on new industries using cleaner methods of waste management. Existing
industries may need time to adapt without incurring unmanageable expenses.
Doug McKenzie: EISs, fines. State government policies. EPA.
Joy Matthews: Polluting industries have no place on this planet - fuel discharges, hot water from mill, bilge water from
overseas ships, sullage & pump-out from recreational boats, bridge painting, run-off from drains.
Ian Tiley: Polluters must face the full force of the law. Pollution is just not acceptable and council would need to send
strong messages accordingly
Helen Tyas Tunggal: I will oppose any new industry with the potential to pollute. We need innovative, non polluting
industries to provide jobs & traineeships. More primary producers, businesses & industries are improving their practices
We need to encourage this. But we also need to implement and enforce the rules, regulations and policies which are
already in place. Council needs to ensure that it is able to set a good example for the rest of the community and ensure
that its own practices are non-polluting.
Merilyn Baxter: These have to meet with Government requirements especially environmental ones. We also as a
council need to make sure that our waterways, atmosphere and ecological systems are not interfered with. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Through imposing appropriate conditions of development consent.
Mark Kingsley: Building inspectors must be strict and make sure that building standards are high. Evidence of bad
construction should be reported to state agencies and pressure placed on agencies to take action against repeat
offenders.
Paul Covington: Council has the responsibility to be transparent when dealing with development applications and
canvass the thoughts of residents and ratepayers who may be affected by proposed industrial development.
Vivienne Hughes: It is Council’s job to ensure that construction works are not badly-managed. I would be surprised and
disappointed if that is not being done already.
Doug McKenzie: Fines if in breach of conditions. Proper conditions set out.
Joy Matthews: I would seek advice from Council’s building inspectors.
Ian Tiley: I would have them referred to the appropriate CVC and State authorities and would support shut downs until
proper management can be guaranteed.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: There are rules in place eg Clarence Valley Sustainable Water DCP. Knowledge of the relevant
act by council employees, together with imposition of fines for non-compliance, should mean that situations like the
pipeline construction along the Glenreagh Road won’t ever happen again.
Merilyn Baxter: Construction work needs to be watched closely by the appropriate departments within the council and
regular inspections carried out. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Effluent discharge must meet EPA requirements. Community expectation and awareness is such that it
requires wide community consultation to endorse major effluent discharge outlets.
Mark Kingsley: Only the minimum amount of effluent should be deposited into our waterways. We need to move
towards recycling and/or drinking 100% of our treated effluent, using the most environmentally friendly treatment
methods.
Simon Williams: I cannot see a future for the Clarence in pumping waste into the ocean. I believe “green” alternatives
should be implemented wherever possible, such as composting systems, use of ‘grey water’ for flushing and gardens &
that the council/government should offer incentives for people to convert to alternate toilet systems & own a water tank.
Paul Covington: Obviously effluent needs to be treated and managed. I would have to assess the different options if
and when they arise. This, of course, involves public consultation and input from people in this profession.
Vivienne Hughes: Recycling of effluent is the most effective method - in large Council operated sewerage systems and
also on-site systems.
Doug McKenzie: Take on board what Yamba sewerage committee has recommended. Study EIS. Relevant to other
areas.
Joy Matthews: Hopefully it is not from sewage treatment works. Treated effluent should be reused on golf courses etc.
Pumpout from boats should be at marinas.
Ian Tiley: I would insist upon staff vigilance in monitoring. I would not tolerate inappropriate discharge. This is my track
record! I was responsible in the late 1990’s for establishing the Iluka and Yamba community groups for addressing
treated STP effluent disposal.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: We need to do more research and education to reduce the amount of potable water going into the
sewerage system. Appropriate decisions need to be made soon in Yamba. We currently have 84% of our treated effluent
(approx. 1.5 megalitres a day) released through the wetlands and flowing into Lake Wooloweyah. This cannot continue.
Merilyn Baxter: All effluent needs to be treated and reused on parks and public lands where appropriate. Before being
discharged anywhere else it needs to be tested for faecal coliform and total coliform. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Restrict development within reasonable distance from a riparian zone. Offer incentives and
encouragement to minimise riparian disturbance.
Mark Kingsley: We need to encourage native vegetation. This may mean planting native plants and/or encouraging
regeneration. It will also be necessary to limit access to riverbank areas that have been badly affected.
Simon Williams: A call for buffer zones for existing riparian vegetation and provision of more vegetation sites
throughout the river system. Drastic changes to the current approaches to sugar cane being grown on riverbanks.
Investigation into the effects of cane fertilizers/pesticides/chemicals/soil degradation & erosion, on the Clarence river
system.
Paul Covington: I supported the proposal for an environmental levy which would have allowed the former Grafton
Council to embark on a number of projects including riparian vegetation restoration.
Vivienne Hughes: Farmers could be given rate incentives to plant native plant species along the water courses and to
fence them off so that livestock cannot destroy them. Council should maintain its own land along the river, particularly
ensuring the reduction of weeds. I would look favourably on any incentive to re-vegetate the catchment area.
Doug McKenzie: Green Corps. Natural Heritage Fund. Suitable plantings. Stop erosion & sedimentation.
Joy Matthews: Stop speedboat excesses on the river. Avoid cattle on the riverbank. Avoid removal of trees from
riverbank.
Ian Tiley: We need to safeguard and augment riparian vegetation wherever possible. I helped prepare the UNC
Catchment Blueprint (Board member) which is to be integrated into the Catchment Management Plan (Northern Rivers
CMA) I am the accredited Regional Development Board interface with the Catchment Management Authority.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: I would advocate absolutely no clearing of native vegetation from riparian zones. The new council
needs to work more closely with established landcarers to utilise resources and access grants in order to repair riparian
vegetation. Utilising information from the SOE reports, strategic plans need to be developed with identified priority areas
targeted for additional support.
Merilyn Baxter: Continue the setting aside of corridors so that riparian vegetation is not destroyed or damaged. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Existing legislation is currently in place to protect threatened species. Council can make use of this
legislation in issuing development consents and in policing the local environmental plan.
Mark Kingsley: We need to continue to protect National Parks. We also need to make sure that all new development
follows environmentally-friendly practices. Council should oppose plans for a major road through environmentally
sensitive areas. It should also consider purchasing private land that contains threatened species.
Simon Williams: I am not sure of the council’s current role so cannot answer specifically. I believe environmental
consideration should be the basis of all decision-making processes in the region.
Paul Covington: State and Federal Governments and Councils need to work closer together to develop policies that
best suit the local environment. What may work in one area may not be the right thing for another. Councils already call
on Threatened Species and EIS reports for developments in sensitive areas.
Vivienne Hughes: Making the community aware of threatened species and asking them to report any sightings would
help to map their whereabouts. Approval of new developments could be dependent upon the maintenance of their
habitats. Some species may need to be re-located to a more suitable habitat, if they are in danger from existing
developments.
Doug McKenzie: Council should protect threatened species as much as possible.
Joy Matthews: I was on Maclean Council’s Koala Protection Committee – we did inspections and noted vegetation
availability, then a report was written and maps of protected areas drawn up. This report is essential when planners are
drawing up local environmental plans and applying zones for urbanisation.
Ian Tiley: Council’s role is articulated in the Threatened Species Act. I would always ensure enforcement of the Act
provisions. I would encourage Voluntary Conservation Agreements & and Property Management Plans . Council should
act in tandem with government agencies to protect threatened species at all costs.
Helen Tyas Tunggal: The new council will be required to map threatened species on its whole valley LEP and then
have it certified by DIPNR. This will affect the DA approval process in areas identified as requiring protection on private
as well as public land. Utilising the SOE reports will assist greatly assist with this task. Whole scale clearing in the name
of weed eradication is not an acceptable practise and council needs to investigate how to manage the valley’s huge
weed problem.
Merilyn Baxter: Public awareness and education in these areas is necessary if we are going to save threatened
species. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: A sustainable water supply without threatening the Nymboida River. Population growth will continue
and availability of water is a priority. Education is important to conserve use – eg tank, re-use and common sense
restrictions.
Mark Kingsley: It is important that we rely on measures other than building new dams to solve our water shortage
problems. We must recycle as much water as possible and be smart about water use. Native gardens & mulching can
save water. I oppose plans for a new dam because I am concerned about the negative impact on the environment.
Simon Williams: That the current practice of using drinking water for toilets, gardens, car washing, industrial & primary
water use cannot continue. Preparation for population expansion; home water tanks, self-conscious regulation of water
use.
Paul Covington: I support the Shannon Creek dam but we need to educate people on better ways to manage our
resources. I would like to think we would never again have to think about building any more dams. Council should
promote grey water usage, subsidize rain water tanks and have building codes that promote both water and energy
efficiency.
Vivienne Hughes: The Nymboida River should not be expected to keep up with the supply of such a large population. It
is necessary to build a more reliable water source – ie the Shannon Creek storage facility. Residents and industry need
to be educated & encouraged to use water wisely all the time. Recycling of waste water should become more prevalent.
Doug McKenzie: Major issues are redirection to Coffs Harbour, Shannon Creek Dam, $ costs. Environmental costs.
Joy Matthews: The main problems are the decreasing rainfall, inability to collect & store water, and the loss of water
conservation practices. It should be legislated for new households to have tanks, and subdivisions must have dual
reticulation. Another issue is that Coffs Harbour is allowed to develop at will, all without natural resources.
Ian Tiley: As a former North Coast Water councillor 1999-2004, I support completion of the Shannon Creek dam with its
wildlife sanctuary & buffer. Access to the dam site for road/ water pipes and power was a difficult environmental issue,
hopefully now properly resolved to the best advantage of the natural environment. I would closely monitor this issue
Helen Tyas Tunggal: We must reduce our consumption and minimise environmental impact on the Nymboida. The
planned water storage facility must be constructed with minimal environmental disruption. We need to introduce water
sensitive urban design wherever possible in green field projects or new subdivisions and encourage existing users to
install tanks. The newly developed Clarence Valley Sustainable Water DCP needs to be finalised and implemented.
Merilyn Baxter: The Clarence Valley currently doesn’t have the capacity to store water in the area. It relies on the
Nymboida River which we now have to share with Coffs Harbour. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: Yes, I have read the report. The best feedback is through the committees and organisations which
contribute to the report. To be used in conjunction with planning instruments.
Mark Kingsley: I am currently locating a copy of the latest report. However, I believe it is important that the
recommendations of a report like this are considered and wherever feasible become part of Council policy.
Simon Williams: I have not seen the report, but I understand it should be used as an important tool for future planning.
Paul Covington: I have flicked through it. Council needs its planners & engineers to be aware of it. I believe this was the
case in the former councils as many worthwhile projects were initiated due to the report. It was referred to in officer’s
reports.
Vivienne Hughes: Yes. These reports provide valuable information on various aspects of the environment and the best
ways to manage it. Such data will be extremely helpful in Council planning and also in decisions involving developments.
It should also be useful in planning water management and waste and effluent disposal.
Doug McKenzie: Yes. Should be incorporated into forward planning.
Joy Matthews: Yes. I have Maclean Council’s and NSW report. When the document is produced there should be a
planning & environment committee that goes through it thoroughly with planing staff.
Ian Tiley: I have read each SOE report since their inception some years ago. There are now, as you would know only
minor adjustments annually and complete overhauls at 5 yearly intervals. All council decision-making processes need to
have proper regard to SOE alerts and requirements
Helen Tyas Tunggal: Yes. As a report card on the condition of our natural resources and environment, this information
is invaluable to management planning. It is a powerful tool that has been largely overlooked. Now that councils are
required to report on 21 core indicators, rather than the vagueness of earlier reports, the annual reports provide even
more valuable opportunities to measure change and performance. The SOE report should drive the finances rather than
the other way around.
Merilyn Baxter: Having read part of the Grafton report I believe these reports are vital to the decision making process in
many areas. A must read for all councillors. Then intelligent and knowledgeable decisions can be made. Top of Page
Chris Gulaptis: As a past mayor I have been on Estuary Committees, sewerage Committees and water recycling
committees. In conjunction with this experience I have a scientific background which I use to determine any decision
before CounciI. I have been forthright and direct with every organisation that has approached me.
Mark Kingsley: I live in Gulmarrad because I love the peace and quiet, the clean air and the local fauna. I have spent a
great deal of time and money acquiring and planting native plants and in creating an environment that is friendly to
native birds, insects, reptiles and frogs. In particular we have made a pond to be a habitat for frogs. I have been vocal in
opposing plans for a motorway through the environmentally sensitive areas of Gulmarrad, Taloumbi and James Creek.
For three years now I have been tutoring Aboriginal students and as a result have developed a great respect and
empathy for Aboriginal people. I am also an advocate for people with disabilities.
Simon Williams: Permaculture studies at Crystal Waters, Maleny. Promotion of Environmental Issues whilst working in
Public school system. Keen interest & participation in environmental protests whilst at SCU Lismore. Genuine love &
care for the valley.
Paul Covington: I would like to think that sensible decisions are in the best interests of the community at large.
Vivienne Hughes: I worked as a Research Officer and Community Information Officer with the Illawarra Regional
Information Service. During that time we were instrumental in helping the region recover from a downturn in the steel
industry. The local councils used information that we provided to help them attract a boarder range of industries, thus
weaning themselves from their dependence on heavy industry. On a voluntary basis, I have assisted in a hostel for
severely disabled children, spent 6 years as a foster parent, 5 years in family planning and pregnancy counselling, 15
years volunteering my services to schools, including 5 years on the school boards, I was on the community consultation
committee for the design of the library and community centre for Dapto and I am currently the President of the St.
Andrew’s Christian School Parents and Friends Association. Last year we set about providing better shaded areas for
the students. For the primary school children we planted 31 local native trees (that are now flourishing) around their
playground. We adapted a wooded area for the high school students. We experimented with the use of recycled sawdust
from a local timber mill to cover the ground. It proved very successful during recent heavy rainfalls in preventing the
ground from becoming muddy and slippery.
Doug McKenzie: Member Yamba Landcare. Chairman Maclean Council Heritage Committee. Past president Yamba,
Angourie, Wooleweyah Community Association.
Joy Matthews: For 8 years I have been part of the education of our communities and school-children on stormwater
management. Helen Tyas Tunggal and I put on a skit about stormwater. We entertained over 1000 people. I was chair of
the NE Waste Forum for 4 years, educating shopping centre crowds on recycling & waste reduction. I was on Brooms
Head Reserve Improvement Committee and organised them in the clean beach challenge. They won that section.
Ian Tiley: 1. Member Upper North Coast Water Management Committee from 1999 t0 2005– prepared Dorrigo and
Orara Water Sharing plans.
2. Member Upper North Coast Catchment Management Board 2000-2003 – prepared Catchment blueprint.
3. Have always been an advocate of sound strategic forward planning.
4. Check me out! I have always stood up to be counted on DAs complying and for environmental issues as Mayor and
councillor at Maclean Council.
5. I have always fought to maintain the integrity of LEPs and DCP’s.
6. I introduced the MSC Biodiversity Strategy, how to consult with youth and many other strategic planning initiatives. I
supported the Clarence Settlement Strategy, the LEP acid sulphate soils, promoted completion of the SEPP 44 Koala
Management plan.
7. I have chaired the Clarence Estuary Committee and the Maclean Shire Coastal Management Committee as well as
the Floodplain Committee. I was first chair of the Clarence Floodplain Partnership.
8. I am passionate about where I live and that our natural environment should be enhanced and not degraded.
I am a strong advocate of CCB (community capacity building)
10. Talk to people like Peter Cuming, Julie Woodroffe, and Marianne Witzig about where I stand on these critical issues.
I submit that the environmental organisations of “Our Clarence” need me to be inside the tent fighting for these issues
and principles. As the most experienced candidate I must be some chance. Your strong support will help me to combat
the greedy, development at almost any cost lobby. We need each other. I look forward to working with you if elected.
Helen Tyas Tunggal:
I am a person of vision and action who promotes participation and collaboration rather than polarisation. I actively
support my local coastcare group working bees, participate in cane toad roundups, co-ordinate combined coastal
protection projects to assist the Birrigan Gargle Landcare group, am a voice for the local community regarding
development and environmental issues and represent the community at council delegations. I have held executive
positions with Angourie Community Coastcare, Angourie Reserve Management Committee, Lower Clarence Youth
Performing Arts, Maclean Youth and Community Orchestra, Maclean Shire Cultural Committee, Angourie Residents and
Ratepayers Association and am a member of Valley Watch, Maclean CWA and the Australian Association of
Environmental Education. I have been described as a path cutter in environmental education and was selected to
represent NSW principals and teachers on the NSW Ministerial Advisory Council for Environmental Education. I have
been a mentor to hundreds of young people providing them support for their community environmental education and art
projects as well as continuing support for many of them in their chosen career paths. I accompanied 3 Harwood Island
students selected to represent Australia in England at the International ‘Leave it To Us’ Children’s Environmental
Conference and have participated in International school grounds planning workshops for the OECD. I have been
responsible for developing comprehensive environmental education programs which have since been distributed free to
all public schools in NSW and sold by the NSW dept of education interstate and overseas. I have assisted more than
200 Australian communities to plan for sustainable development and management of their school grounds as
Learnscapes. I have developed the Water Ambassador Program and associated resources which are being utilised in a
variety of council areas across NSW. I have assisted with the development of a Total Water Cycle Management
resource package for Clarence Valley schools. As program designer and facilitator, recipient of variety of more than 10
environmental awards. I believe I have the capacity and the tenacity to provide real balance, a voice for the valley and a
voice for the future in a new one-valley council.
Merilyn Baxter:
Very little as it is only of late that I have been researching some of the relevant issues. Top of Page